FDA’s Blood Testing Monopoly Dealt Blow

For years the agency has been attempting a power grab, but it’s just been told to stop. Action Alert!
For some time, we’ve been telling you about the FDA’s attempt to impose pre-market approval requirements on laboratory developed tests (LDTs). The agency’s efforts were, thankfully, just dealt a major blow: the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) announced that the FDA will no longer be regulating LDTs. This is a major victory that will open the door to innovation in a sector of medicine that is incredibly important.
Specifically, HHS states: “FDA will not require premarket review of laboratory developed tests (“LDT”) absent notice-and-comment rulemaking, as opposed to through guidance documents, compliance manuals, website statements, or other informal issuances.” Part of the reason for this may be that LDTs are already regulated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). CLIA requires laboratories to hire scientifically qualified personnel and to follow rigorous testing, analytical validation and record-keeping procedures.
These changes could allow a wave of innovation in this industry. The FDA claimed authority over LDTs after Congress amended the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1976. But since that time, the agency has only singled out a handful of LDTs for active enforcement. This threat of regulation tends to have a chilling effect on innovation, since labs developing new tests didn’t know whether the FDA would target them or not. With this announcement, hopefully that situation will change.
The FDA’s power grab on LDTs undoubtedly cost lives in the COVID-19 pandemic. It was the FDA’s choice to regulate LDTs for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Labs needed to wait for the agency to grant Emergency Use Authorizations to run their tests, costing valuable time at the outset of the pandemic and delaying the deployment of widespread testing for the coronavirus.
How the feds treat LDTs is enormously important. Medical testing is the future of medicine. New tests already exist to spot cancers long before they manifest themselves otherwise. But these tests are very expensive, and neither Medicare nor insurance companies will pay for them. If they become more widely available, the price will fall. Testing can also help prevent diabetes, heart and blood vessel illness, prostate cancer, and other diseases.
LDTs are not only important for general medicine; they’re the future of individualized medicine. Integrative doctors use these tests to gather information that aids them in identifying the root causes of their patients’ illnesses—information that cannot be gathered and analyzed otherwise. If the FDA moved forward with its proposal, these developments would have been halted and medicine would be set back years.
There are many more reforms that must be enacted to improve medicine in this country. If you haven’t already, please sign our petition to reform a health system that blocks access to natural treatments that generally cannot go through FDA approval.
Action Alert! Sign our petition that seeks to reform a healthcare system that blocks access to natural treatments that generally cannot go through FDA approval. Please send your message immediately.


  1. I am an advocate for LDT’s!
    I am 81 years old & have been using LDTs for 56 years.
    I am healthy, have had only a cold or during these 59+ years.

  2. “There are many more reforms that must be enacted to improve medicine in this country.” You can say that again, and again, and again! Revolutionary War hero Benjamin Rush warned us over two centuries ago of what would surely happen to the practice of medicine in this country if we weren’t very careful to prevent it. Unfortunately Rush’s dire warnings were not paid any attention to, and things have gotten far worse than I’m sure even Rush could have imagined in his worst nightmare.
    I believe what we need is a strong, unfettered private healthcare system with as little government meddling as possible, at both the federal and the state level.
    I’m keeping my fingers, toes and eyes crossed that when word finally gets out to the general public what a horrific job government agencies have done in managing the current coronavirus “plandemic” (such as sending infected patients into nursing homes and discouraging, even preventing the use of HCQ and nutritional supplements like vitamins C and D, and zinc), a lot more people will start seriously asking, “Isn’t there an alternative to putting politicians and bureaucrats in charge of our healthcare that would serve us better?”
    We, each of us individually, really need to contribute as much as we can in whatever way we can to educating the general public about how such an alternative healthcare system might work. Then when there are enough of us on board we must ultimately take decisive political action into our own hands, just as when the voters in many states (by referendums and such, not by laws passed by their elected political “leaders”) decided that cannabis should be made legally available for medical use regardless of the FDA’s opinion to the contrary.
    I heartily thank ANH for helping to lead the way!

  3. Reform a healthcare system that blocks access to natural treatments that generally cannot go through FDA approval.

Comments are closed.