Do We Really Need GMOs to Help Feed the Poor?

“GMOs will help feed the world.” This is what we hear, in one form or another, as one of the main arguments in favor of GMO technology. It may be a good tactic, but is not a truthful one.
The scientists who just won the World Food Prize have provided useful evidence that we don’t need GMOs to feed the poor. They were able to use conventional plant-breeding techniques to fortify sweet potatoes with higher levels of vitamin A.
Vitamin A deficiency is pandemic in Southeast Asia and Africa. It causes blindness, stunting, and immune suppression, making people more vulnerable to disease and death. This condition affects an estimated 140 million preschool children in developing countries, and is the leading cause of childhood blindness.
Sweet potatoes are a traditional source of vitamin A in the human diet. The new vitamin-enriched sweet potato, along with other vitamin and mineral-enriched crops (such as iron- and zinc-fortified beans, rice, and wheat), are estimated to have helped 10 million people already.
Let’s compare the success of these conventionally bred crops with the track record of Golden Rice, the example often used by proponents of GMOs to help make their case. Golden Rice is white rice that has been genetically engineered to synthesize beta-carotene after the carotenoid is stripped away, which happens when natural rice is processed. Time magazine famously heralded Golden Rice as “The Rice that Could Save a Million Kids a Year” in 2000.
Sixteen years later, however, Golden Rice has failed in almost every respect. Farmers and agricultural experts have not been able to grow Golden Rice as successfully as other non-genetically modified rice strains, despite boatloads of research money being thrown at the problem from the Rockefeller and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations. In one country actively working to cultivate Golden Rice, the Philippines, vitamin A deficiency is declining without the use of Golden Rice, from 40% of children aged six months to five years in 2003, to 15% in 2008. (You can read more about Golden Rice in our newly updated GMO Facts microsite.)
It’s also interesting to note that almost none of the news coverage of the vitamin-enriched sweet potato mentions that it is not genetically engineered. Is this a deliberate omission in an effort to propagate the myth that we need GMOs to feed the world, or did all of these news organizations coincidentally make the same error? You decide.
Other articles in this week’s Pulse of Natural Health:
Glyphosate: Will the EPA Capitulate to Its Cronies?
Tylenol During Pregnancy Linked to Autism


  1. There is a lot of interesting information on the internet about what is called the System of Rice Intensification (SRI), which is now being generalized to the System of Crop Intensification (SCI). This needs to be explored a lot further as the key to feeding the world, especially in developing countries, instead of GMOs.

  2. Why is it that the US is the only country still debating this? GMOs are banned almost everywhere else in the world.

    1. Because we are governed by the biggest payoffs. My congressman started off representing the people but now seems to vote mostly for the big corporations. Or should I say BIG donors?

  3. I think we need GMO’s to feed the rich since they seem to think it’s such a good idea. Practice what you preach!

    1. Especially those paid big bucks to make a speech at Monsanto. Hillary also gave them tips on how to sell their GMO garbage.

  4. I wonder what the fate of Golden Rice in the Philippines will be now that the president, Rodrigo Duterte, has publicly announced that the country will be severing ties with the US and advance an independent agenda? Will he reject Golden Rice entirely from the country? I haven’t heard anything suggesting that conclusion yet, but since he just made the announcement very recently, I think we should pay attention to this development.

Comments are closed.